The court found several of the shared messages to be derogatory and dehumanizing toward specific minority groups.
The case centers on online posts and published materials.
The defense argued for the primacy of the (constitutional protection of speech).
The court found several of the shared messages to be derogatory and dehumanizing toward specific minority groups.
The case centers on online posts and published materials.
The defense argued for the primacy of the (constitutional protection of speech).